For a wedding photographer, it common to have an "only photographer" contingency in our contract?
The wedding photographer has put in the following contingency in the contract "No other photographer/photography shall be permitted while photographer is photographing any aspect of Wedding, Reception, or related activity (Individual guests with personal cameras excepted). " Is this standard operating procedure? What does this guy have to lose if he is being paid?
OK, so I should have probably added that this is being done as a barter situation; services were rendered in exchange for the wedding photo package. It is an all inclusive package that has already been "pre-paid". He stands to lose nothing.
Yes, this is normal to request that no other photographer be there. It is because if he poses you guys, but someone else takes the photo and claims it as their work, it's unfair.
I have meet with 5 photographers, and all 5 had this clause in their contract.
Your Place Or Mine (1998)
Tags: flash · photo · photography · standard wedding photography contract · standard wedding photography contract template · tools · webdesignNo Comments
0 responses so far ↓
Like gas stations in rural Texas after 10 pm, comments are closed.